![]() ![]() Try to imagine fighting someone using only backhand strikes. Facing it "down" is a much more natural configuration for hand-to-hand combat. Which makes the scene in the fourth Alien movie where two drones kill a third so its acidic blood will eat through the floor even more acceptable presumably, they were careful to keep it alive while they were gutting it to ensure the acid would remain potent as long as possible. So it's natural to assume the later stages of the species do similarly after they die. when they find the dead facehugger at that point it's mentioned that its acidic blood neutralizes after its death. It stands to reason that a species who has dealt with these Aliens for eons would know how to make the skull usable and/or have technology that would do it.Īlso, think back to the first movie. ![]() The acid is bad, but you can take the time to clean it and make the helmet usable. It's like you take a football helmet full of battery acid. As such, if one component of the Alien is not acidic (or otherwise obviously fatal to non-Aliens), it stands that others are not, either, such as the interior lining of the exoskeleton. The train of logic follows thus: We know the blood is acidic, but not the exoskeleton. If you mean where she's using the skull as a "shield" of sorts, then the obvious answer is that it was cleaned. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |